HOW TO ANSWER Where Do You See Yourself in Five Years

HOW TO ANSWER â€" Where Do You See Yourself in Five Years When you’re asked about your vision for the next five years, you might feel like it’s an odd question. First off, how could you know? And second, you might want to say you want to be in Ibiza drinking martinis.Both are legitimate thoughts but neither is a good basis for actually answering this question. Instead, you should continue reading this post, as you’ll learn everything you need to know about answering the dreaded “Where do you see yourself in five years” â€"question in style.In the below post, you will learn:The reason you have to answer this questionHow to identify and think about your career goalsHow to balance your career goals with what the role has on offerWhat to say in the 3 most common career scenariosWhat are the mistakes you have to avoidWhat 5 example answers would look likeLet’s get started!WHY IS THIS QUESTION ASKED?Job interview questions are not just random questions the interview throws around to waste time. Each question has become popular because it can help the interview learn more about you as the candidate and to make a judgement call on your value and suitability for the role.When the interviewer asks where you see yourself in five years, they are essentially looking to learn two things:What your career goals areCareer goals are important and valuable because they show whether you are motivated, ambitions and goal-driven.These are important qualities for an employer because if they have a motivated and ambitious workforce, then the employees will be productive and help the organisation to reach its goals faster.If you don’t have any kind of idea of the future, you don’t seem like the kind of worker who has drive and passion to succeed. This can spook the employer because they don’t want to hire someone who’s not sure about their career ambitions.This could mean you’re either looking for a job for the wrong reasons or you suddenly end up realising you’re in the wrong role altogether and leave.How those goals align with the positionNow, when interviewers are asking for your career goals, they don’t just want to know you have ambition and drive. In fact, they want to ensure you like the job you’re applying for and that you’re serious about getting it (and then succeeding in it).Plainly put, the interviewer wants to know you will still see yourself in the role and the company in five years time.Hiring is expensive and time-consuming. Companies don’t want to hire employees, even if they are talented if the person is going to leave within the next few years and they have to start over again.Therefore, when asking this question, the interviewer is essentially looking for reassurance you are motivated for this specific position! They want to know you have the drive to succeed in this particular role â€" to ensure you’re not just looking to run off in a few months.FIRST THINGS FIRST: DO YOU ACTUALLY KNOW YOUR CAREER GOALS?Before you even begin to think about answering this question, y ou must make sure you have an idea of your actual career goals. You should always have short-, medium-, and long-term goals. Career goals are important because they will help you:Focus on actions that help you reach your goals and avoid wasting time on those that don’t.Maintain your motivation and job satisfaction, leading to a happier life.If you haven’t paid attention to your career goals, you can find a lot of useful information on how to do it here and here. However, here is a short, five-step way to jotting down your five-year goals.STEP 1:Write down your ideal career situation in five years. This is the dream â€" be ambitious with a pinch of realism thrown into the mix. What would make you happy, motivated and satisfied?STEP 2:Consider your skills and current career trajectory. Think about the above idea goals in terms of your current career path. Does it seem realistic? What kind of changes would you need to make to achieve those goals? What are the skills that’ll help you achieve those goals?STEP 3:Write down your goals and break them into smaller goals. Identify the specific situation you want to be in and the path to getting there. Use the SMART decision-making strategy.STEP 4:Create a roadmap for achieving those goals. Use the information to create a roadmap to your five-year goals. Establish short-term goals ranging from year 1, year 2 and so on to break these into months and even weeks.STEP 5:Have a look at your goals regularly. You should make sure to remind yourself of these goals regularly â€" you want to examine how well you are doing by examining your goals every week or month. Are you achieving your goals? What is going well and what might be going wrong?Now, once you have identified your true five-year career goals, you should consider how this position fits them. You should think about your goals and the job position you are applying for and answer the following questions:What are you looking for from this position?How will the posit ion help you in terms of your career goals?What about the position appeals to you the most?You want to start thinking about the ways this position can take you closer to your ultimate five-year goals and professional fulfilment.ALIGN YOUR CAREER GOALS WITH THE ROLE YOU’RE INTERVIEWING FORThe above is not, however, necessarily what you should say when asked about your five-year goals. It’s more to help you understand the reasons for applying to this role and to ensure you do have some kind of roadmap going forward.It’s important to have both short- and long-term goals because they will give you focus and this will help you move forward and to stay happy and motivated.The reason you shouldn’t just use the above information as your answer is down to remembering what the interviewer wants from your answer.You have to remember it’s essential you align your own career goals with the role you are interviewing for and you make it obvious you are not just using the job as a steppin g-stone for another role or even company.You, therefore, have to find a balance between your actual career goals and aligning them with the role and company you are looking to obtain. You must make it so your goals are in harmony with those the organisation wants to achieve and the role you’re expected to perform.This means having an understanding of what the position and the company are going to offer.In order to answer this question, you must conduct research into the organisation, its vision and the role in general.You should also try to understand what kind of career options it might provide so you are aware whether the company could cater to your career objectives or not.First, you should research the company in broad terms. You want to consider things like:What is the company’s vision and what kind of path is it on?What kind of career path does the company offer?Do they have job development and/or training programs employees can attend?What kind of promotion policy do they have?What are the roles you might be promoted to/apply for with more experience?You can find this information from the company website and by talking to people who work or have worked in the company.See if you know people working in the organisation or those who might have worked there. You can also consider reading company reviews from sites like Glassdoor.com.After this, you also want to think about the role you’re applying for. You want to think about what it will teach you, the skills you’ll gain and the things you want to do if you get that position.You don’t want to think about where it will lead â€" this is not just about how the job will move you forward, but more about what the job can give you while you’re in it.You should keep your focus on the role and your enthusiasm for it. Your answer shouldn’t be about you and your goals but exactly where you see yourself in five years because of this role. In a sense, you want to answer this question like it was asked as, “Where will this role get you in five years?”You want to highlight your desire to perform in this role and be the best you can be. Of course, you have to do this in a realistic manner and not make any sort of promises.You don’t want to say things like “I’ll turn the company around” or “I want to sell more cars than anyone ever” at this point â€" this question is really more about development and progression rather than trying to predict the futuryye.NAVIGATING THE 3 COMMON SCENARIOS WITH YOUR ANSWERThe above gives you the right balance to strike in your answer. You know what your own personal career goals are but you also understand how the company’s career path, vision and the role, in general, influence those.Now, when you are trying to align your personal goals with what the company and role have on offer, you will likely encounter three different scenarios.The three situations you might find yourself at this point are that you view the role as are:Stepping-sto ne to something else â€" in five years, you don’t really want to see yourself still in the same role and you are likely to move beyond the company as well.Opportunity for a career path â€" you’re not quite sure where you will be in five years because the role would be a career change for you and you are kind of testing waters.Uncertain place â€" you don’t know enough about the company due to lack of resources available and you think it might not offer the kind of path forward you want.Let’s examine those in detail and look at the best ways to answer them.You find the company and the role as a stepping-stoneSo, you know the job is just going to be a bit of a stepping-stone for you. It’s alright â€" you’re not going to hold a single job for the rest of your life and you will need to experience different roles in order to get to your thing.While everyone knows this, you can’t really go out and say it to a hiring manager. Remember that they don’t want to be hiring a new person all the time.So, how could you respond? You should find something you can commit to even though you might not be committing to staying in the company after five years.You don’t have to lie â€" as you’ll read later, you should never lie, in fact â€" since you can simply talk about things you’d like to achieve in the role. You want to think about those small goals you want to focus on from day one in the new job and the goals you want to keep working on for as long as you stay.You could say something like this:“I’ve noticed you have an employee training program which I really want to be part of. I’m always looking to improve my skills and talent and I hope to continue doing so in this role as well. I’m also very passionate about small business and I hope the next five years, with your business projects, will give me a lot of opportunities to work with many different small businesses.”The main thing is to focus on the good the role and company is going to offer a nd how this will help you.You don’t want to get hung up on the knowledge you probably won’t be there in five years but instead, focus on what it might look like if you were â€" what are the things you are looking forward to in this role?You’re changing careers and don’t quite know what the future holdsYou might also be in the process of changing careers. You can’t really know where you are going to be in five years because you are currently in the process of finding it out. This job is your opportunity if this role and industry is the way forward.What can you say that doesn’t freak out the interviewer? It’s important to focus on some kind of long-term goals and your vision for your career.You should have some kind of idea what you’re looking for in this role. You can think about your answer in terms:What do you want this position to teach you?What are the things you are looking forward to in this role?You can then talk about these with your answer and say something l ike:“I’m applying to this copywriting position because I’ve always wanted to be more creative. I think this will help me learn more about the creative side of the world while still using my IT skills with the digital projects the company has. I think this combination will help me and I really want to make a mark in the industry â€" developing the creative side further.”You highlight your desires and transferable skills without going too much into detail for how you’re searching for the right path.You don’t know if the company offers a path forwardSometimes you might not be quite sure about your five-year goals and how the company might align with those. You might not be able to find information to see if the path forward is there or you simply don’t know if it’s good for you at this point.How to approach the question then? You really want to focus on the important things you think the position will teach you and things the company can offer without saying openly that you already know you want to move on.You can do this by first answering these questions:What kind of skills would the job teach me and which I’m eager to gain?What kind of projects might the company offer to me?What long-term goals or visions does the company have and do they align with mine?You can use your answers and create an answer that talks about how you are looking forward to developing yourself in this position.Furthermore, you can take this approach further and focus on the ability to develop your skills.For example, you could think if there are courses you could take to be better in the role you’re interviewing for (and which would help you in moving forward).For example, you could say something like:“As a programme developer, I want to keep developing my skills. In five years, I really want to have learned about new software in the field and have a better understanding of AI. I really think this opportunity will help me use AI more and so I’m thinking of taking courses to help me with the role and be the best I can in five years time.”You are focusing on specific skills and talking about personal and professional growth without talking in detail where your career, per se, is going to take you.DON’T MAKE THESE MISTAKES, NO MATTER WHATWhen you’re answering interview questions like this one, you often have to think about what not to say to ensure success. Few things could damage your changes, especially in terms of talking about your five-year plans.The three things you have to avoid mentioning when answering this question are:1. Saying you don’t knowIn all honesty, we can’t know where will be in five years time.But this isn’t about predicting your future â€" as mentioned above, the interviewer is looking to see if you have thought about your career path and if you will be loyal to the company if hired.You don’t have to have your whole life and career planned out and things can always change. But you do want to show the intervie wer how you’re serious about the role.Here’s an example answer of what you shouldn’t say:“Five years? Oh, I don’t know… I hardly know what I’ll do tomorrow!”2. LyingIf there is one universal thing to avoid when answering any type of interview question, it’s lying. You can’t lie during a job interview because the likelihood of being caught in a lie is huge and the consequences of that could ruin your career aspirations for good.You don’t have to say what your exact aspirations are. As mentioned, you do want to tailor your answer to be encouraging in terms of your motivation towards the role.However, you can omit things but you don’t want to make things up.For example, you might well want to be in an executive position within five years but you don’t necessarily want to mention this if it’s unlikely to happen in this role.Instead, you can talk about your desire to have more responsibilities and succeeding in your job. The key is to just avoid lying in order to cover your actual plans.3. Joking about your futureJob interviews are not about cracking the best jokes â€" unless you are applying for some stand-up job. It’s important to stay professional throughout.Saying you see yourself living with 20 cats in five years is unlikely to get a laugh from your interviewer.5 EXAMPLE ANSWERS WHY THEY ARE GOODYou now have the tools to create the best answer to “Where do you see yourself in five years”.To help make it even easier, it can be helpful to examine some common answers to this question.These are not answers you should copy, as your own situation will always be unique.However, you might find them inspiring and they will help you understand the good points your answer should always focus on.“I’m glad you asked that because one of the big reasons I wanted to apply to this position was how well it aligns with my idea of a good employer in terms of my career path. You are known for your commitment to employee growth and advancement and I find this important. In five years, I wish I had been able to take part in the training opportunities you have and improve my skill set in leadership. I’m a driven and passionate person so I hope in five years I would have improved my skill set and perhaps advanced to a managerial position.”This is good because it shows you’ve done your company research and you understand what kind of company you are dealing with. You showcase your fit in the company environment and focus on your desire to improve your talent and desire to stay in the company.“I’m always looking to improve and in five years, I want to be better at what I do than I am right now. I like to work with start-ups and I wish this position would help me take on interesting projects that allow me to support start-ups in the field. I hope to meet innovative and inspiring people and perhaps even become a mentor myself.”It’s a good, short and descriptive answer. Again, it focuses on the position at hand but also shows you are interested in additional responsibilities, such as mentoring. You show ambition and desire for growth.“My five-year goals are mostly to do with growing my design portfolio. I’m really excited about this particular opportunity because it would allow me to work with more companies and projects, using my innovative and creative ideas to help others. I would love to take on bigger projects and perhaps even lead a team of other designers.”This is another example of a specific example that’s focused on the actual profession and the company. It focuses on the things you’d do in the role and highlights desire to take on responsibilities.“In five years, I wish to have gained more knowledge in consulting. Since my background is in accounting, I really want to be able to apply these skills with the financial consulting field and be able to help clients realise their financial potential. I’m looking forward to taking more courses in management and leadership as I believe these would help me.”If you’re transitioning from one career path to another, the above is an example of a good answer. It showcases your understanding of what the position requires and highlights your willingness to learn more.It acknowledges the doubts the interviewer might have (regarding your background in another industry) and mentions the benefits and strengths this might bring about.“I’m most passionate about working for non-profits and this position is, therefore, like a dream come true. I’m looking forward to working with new clients and to learn more about how the investment sector can help these organisations to flourish. I’m also interested in taking a few IT courses on my free time as I believe these skills would help me further down the line.”You talk about the role and what you are most passionate about it. You don’t go into too much detail because you might not know too many details about the company or you’re unsure if you’ll stay, per haps.However, you do present yourself as a passionate and forward-looking person who wants to develop their skillset.CONCLUDING REMARKSWhen it comes answering the question “Where do you see yourself in five years” is not a trick question. It has a lot of weight and it’s another opportunity for you to sell yourself for the role.The key is to remember to stay honest to your own goals and align those with what the role could mean for your career.Above, you’ve learned the importance to research the organisation and to avoid the common mistakes you could make with the question.You know how to be realistic, enthusiastic and how to present yourself as the best candidate for the role â€" no matter what your ideal career goals are.

Creationism Vs. Evolution - 1130 Words

Where do we come from? The creation of the world has been told through many different stories, and from a variety of religions across the world. The argument between evolution and creation has been debated back and forth for years. So how do we know which claim is correct? Has all life evolved from simple bacteria to all the species that appear today, or did life on earth begin with Gods creation of Adam from dust and his partner Eve from adam’s rib bone. As a child I grew up attending church every Sunday with my grandparents, attending bible school, and taught the ways of the Lord. I wouldn’t know any different until my eyes were opened in biology class where the theory of Evolution is justified. There are different explanations to†¦show more content†¦This occurs when a species is separated and mate with a different species, changing their genetic composition, if then the two species were to be brought back together and mate again, it would cause what is cal led ‘gene migration’. This process gives so many different variations among the species, which allows more and more variation and population. This process also explains endangered species and extinction. The main controversy creationist have with accepting the theories of evolution is how all different life forms were produced using genetic material that was present and reproduced from the first living cells. Yet this claim has not fully been proved correct, scientific discoveries and theories have given it great justice so far. Aside from genetic variation, crossbreeding, survival of the fittest etc. Such drastic changes from species to species are due to mutations. In most eyes, mutations are considered to be harmful and destructive. Which is true in some cases, but they are also beneficial in the case of genetics and evolution. Many helpful mutations are incorporated into the normal genotype through natural selection, and when harmful mutations do occur the process of natural selection kills that mutation off. Without randomly occurring mutations, there would have been no development of life and no evolution would have taken place. Many religious people in factShow MoreRelatedEvolution Creationism Vs. Creationism924 Words   |  4 PagesAny point of contact with the scientific world in the 21st century will eventually lead one to the one of the most hotly contested topic in American education, that of evolution versus creationism. While the creationist point of view, as well as the evolutionary perspective, hosts a great variation of opinion amongst its supporters, Christianity is brought to the center stage time after time (Vuletic, 1994). Literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis’ account of creation falls contrary to theRead More Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay1323 Words   |  6 PagesEvolution vs. Creationism Abstract In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all threeRead More Creationism vs. Evolution Essays1663 Words   |  7 PagesCreationism vs. Evolution This paper will focus on the huge controversy between Creationism and Evolution. I will provide two opposing viewpoints on this subject. First, the discussion will focus on the question of why many people believe that God created the universe and all living things. On the other end of the spectrum, scientific information will be presented that substantiates the evidence against the existence of God. This creationism counter-argument known as evolution has itsRead More Evolution vs. Creationism Essay917 Words   |  4 Pages Evolution vs. Creationism The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin’s conclusion; that organisms descended from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution of species adapting to their environment. The following are the main geological topicsRead More Creationism vs. Evolution Essay1158 Words   |  5 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Where we come from is a question as old as mankind itself. There are countless numbers of religions, each with their own twist on the origins of earth and mankind, but one of the most highly visible debates would be creationism vs. evolution. Depending on where your beliefs lie, the Earth has been around somewhere in the neighborhood of 6,000 years to 4.5 billion years. One would tend to believe that this vast differe nce in time would make it impossible to have 2 â€Å"theories† thatRead MoreEvolution Vs. Creationism Debate1265 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper I will be explaining two sides of the evolution vs. creationism debate. The topics I am going to write about are fossil evidence, the origin of life, and Darwin’s â€Å"theory† of natural selection. I will be presenting a view of both sides of the argument they will be on the creation side and evolution standpoint. I would suggest that you, the reader, would have a previous knowledge of all the topics so that you may get a full understanding of both sides. If there is no prior knowledgeRead MoreCreationism Vs. Evolution Essay1318 Words   |  6 Pagespublished his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, which proposed the theory of evolution. This book, along with others that followed, began the long dispute between evolutionist and creationist. Were we created by a supernatural Supreme Being, or did our creation occur purely by chance? First, lets look at the two conflicting theories. Common usage of the term â€Å"evolution† is that living things in our world have come into existence through unguided naturalistic processesRead MoreCreationism vs. Evolution Essay1170 Words   |  5 Pagesassumptions with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting such ideological dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come, the scientific research grew and developed into theories like the Big Bang and evolution, though primarily in places where such progress was tolerated. The state of Tennessee in 1925 was not such a place. In the town of DaytonRead MoreCreationism vs. Evolution Essay1349 Words   |  6 Pages Creationism is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe was originally created rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into chance existence. We reside on the surface of a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest and death w e bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics, philosophy, springtime, depravity, farming, courtship, quasars, and iphones; all came from nothingness?,Read MoreEssay on Evolution VS. Creationism1412 Words   |  6 Pagesof man and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question. Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different

Why Women Should Not Be Allowed in Combat Occupations Essay

Since 1901, women have served in some form of the military, however, dating back to the American Revolution women have had an unofficial role. Women have had and will continue to have an important role in the military, the question is whether women should be allowed to occupy specific combat positions. Traditionally women have not been allowed in combat occupations, but recently these restrictions have been somewhat lifted, making certain occupations available to women. Despite the lift complications arise from women being in combat vocations and it’s not just because of the physical differences, there is also the increased risk of sexual assault. Due to the detrimental impact on the military, soldiers, and society, women should not†¦show more content†¦In January 1994, the â€Å"Secretary of Defense Les Aspin overturned the risk rule excluding women from any positions that could expose them to direct combat, hostile fire, or capture; the rule was replaced by th e direct ground combat assignment rule, which more narrowly tailored the restriction to front line combat positions.† (Mackenzie) According to the 1994 Department of Defense policy, women were limited from some occupational specialties if those specialties were physically located with direct ground combat units. According to a press release the Army will begin implementing the DoD policy. â€Å"Removing the restrictions opened 13,139 Army positions to women, occupations like; Multiple Launch Rocket System crewmember, MLRS operations fire detection specialist, Field artillery fire finder radar operator specialist, M1 Abrams tank system maintainer, Bradley Fighting Vehicle system maintainer, and Artillery mechanic.† (Wong) Regardless of the recent policy changes, the distinction between combat and support roles are still unclear. â€Å"Since women are permitted to serve in such support units, a major barrier designed to keep them away from combat has vanished.† (Mackenzie) In today’s war there is no clear front line or a safe area in the rear, making combat support operationsShow MoreRelatedPros And Cons Of Women In The Military885 Words   |  4 PagesWomen in the Military Women being in the military has become more prevalent in the last few decades, but are they helping or hurting the military by doing so? Women being allowed in the military dates all the way back to World War I where women would serve as nurses to aid wounded soldiers (Wood). Now, women are allowed to serve in different roles, combat being one of them. There is controversy whether the military is a place for women, but research shows pros and cons to both sides. EvenRead MoreEquality for Women in our Society Essay1150 Words   |  5 PagesEven though women are soft and delicate, women deserve equality because they are compassionate, intelligent, strong, and work as hard compared to men. Women can defuse a situation in a compassionate, intellectual manner and work hard at it until peace is reached. Women should be treated equally to men because they have the same qualities in most areas as men and have qualities that some men lack. Women and men are very different in the aspect of physical and mental attributes. Women, in generalRead MoreWomen During The 21st Century1281 Words   |  6 Pagesonly of race but also of genders. Today, there are fewer occupations that remain solely masculine, women are constantly conquering new positions and demonstrating they are also capable of participating in physically challenging activities. Women are seen stronger than ever. It is often said a girl can do anything a boy can. That sounds great and empowering, but is that truly so? 50 years ago, the idea of a woman serving in the army in full combat would seem ridiculous, in present day it is a realityRead MoreFeminism Is The Organized Activity On Behalf Of Women s Rights And Interests1154 Words   |  5 PagesEveryone Deserves Respect Throughout history, there have been many groups of women called feminists, which are women who support feminism. In history class, you hear about active feminists and their rebellions, but what does feminism mean exactly? â€Å"Feminism is the organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests† (Webster). Feminists strive for equal rights for women in politics, society, and workforce. Karen Kornbluh and Rachel Homer are two feminist writers who wrote an article, â€Å"PaycheckRead MoreWhy Women Should Be Allowed to Participate in Combat1236 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Women Should be Allowed to Participate in Combat When warring tribes fought over food or men during our first beginnings, those women were undoubtedly in combat†¦women warriors [later in history] were not considered so unusual†¦Joan of Arc and Bodecia fought as warriors. Women fought in the Civil War alongside their buddies, only to be found out once they were slain in battle (Culture Society) Introduction After years of discussion and debate it appears that soon women will be sent into combatRead MoreAn Argument Essay About Discrimination1635 Words   |  7 PagesArgument Essay Some may say discrimination in America is a thing in the past, but is this a true statement? Are men and women always seen and treated as equals in our new and reformed nation? I am sure there are many debates out there proving or disproving this potential issue, but one in particular has caught my eye. Our military is made up of many different sections, and the men and women who were brave enough to raise their right hand and enlist in the service were given a skill to master resulting inRead MoreThe Wonderful Workforce 867 Words   |  4 Pagescitizens should pursue and promotes an idea of inequality in employment opportunities. In tradition, the man is the breadwinner of the family; while this has changed, men still dominate many career paths. Once upon a time, only men were allowed to play sports in high school. This had drastically changed, due to Title IX, a law that provided opportunities to different career paths (â€Å"Mythbusting†). But, on a professional sport level, women are not seen playing in the NFL or the NBA. Women haveRead MoreThe Debate Of Women s Military Combat1914 Words   |  8 PagesOctober 2014 Women in Combat The debate of whether women should participate in military combat is a controversial issue worldwide. While the majority of the western countries, such as America, believe in the conservative values associated with women in combat forces, eastern countries, like Israel, do not fully support these ideals. Some believe it is a woman’s equal right, some believe it will cause negative affects on the family’s life, and others believe women in combat should receive the rightsRead More Women in the Military Essay4227 Words   |  17 Pages In Women in the Military, Janette Mance explores the debates and problems faced by the increasing number of women involved in the military. After examining issues such as pregnancy, sexual harassment, and rape, Mance concludes that as a society we must continue to strive for gender equality. From the storm lashed decks of the Mayflower to the present hour, women have stood like a rock for the welfare and glory of the history of our country . . . and one might well add: unwritten, unrewardedRead MoreWomen During The Military War1610 Words   |  7 PagesWomen over the course of hundreds of years have always struggled to be equivalent to men. Weather that be the right to vote, the right to speak up, or the right to lead. Leadership for example, is founded upon many different grounds. One being the military. Having a role in the military meant something greater than having a â€Å"regular† occupation to women. It meant that one has the opportunity to lead his/her country. To be the difference in the world. Females also wanted a taste of what it’s like

Weaving Architecture Nature Free Essays

string(78) " the concept of one with nature is Frank Lloyd Wright’s 4 Billingsgate\." Landscape from its beginnings has a man-made connotation with associated cultural process values. The idea of having a landscape does not suggest anything natural at all. Yet there are instances of projects where the landscape itself suggests natural connotations as though there is no interface between nature (site) and culture (architecture). We will write a custom essay sample on Weaving Architecture Nature or any similar topic only for you Order Now In Chichi Art Museum, Today And made a radical decision to create an underground space to create minimal changes to the current natural environment, exposing only very basic geometries as the openings for the underground gallery. He transformed the site into a natural work of art, interfacing with the internal works of art. On the other hand, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Billingsgate transforms the original site into a beautiful monumental landscape and brings nature into the house by using materials found on site, creating natural experiences through his architecture. Yet the ideas of the interface between Nature and architecture are translated very differently for the 2 projects. Nod’s idea of the interface was a stark exposed one while Wright’s was more clear and rational. This paper seeks to find out whether one of their interpretations questionable, or it is Just harder to comprehend one than the other. Keywords: Nature; Integration; Art; Landscape; Culture 1. INTRODUCTION Figure 1 . Illustration of the Phases of Museum Development The concept of museums since the late 18th century evolved through 3 different phases (Figure 1). The first generation are mostly built by royalties as part of their collections, the second generation museums are more particular in presenting artworks and collections in their raw form, where exhibition spaces are designed to segregate the works from any context using spaces that is ere and abstract. As art works progressed further, artists evolved to creating works that are more specific, works that interact with surroundings and also visitors. This concept itself brings out the definition of cultural landscape by Saucer (Saucer 1925, 46), where the art works themselves represents the cultural interference to the surrounding natural landscape. Here, the architect undertakes a special role as the direct influencer to the landscape. The Chichi Art Museum by Today And is one of the first of the 3rd development of museums, specially designed to house the works f Claude Monet, Walter De Maria and James Turrets, or on a higher level, to integrate their works with the natural environment. The way Today And created his cultural landscape, interfacing with nature with his strong use of man made materials concrete and glass, gives us a new perspective on how one interfaces with their surroundings. 2 THE ORIGIN The concept emerged due to a similarity between the artists in the history of art – they question modern art and architecture and the â€Å"quality of aesthetic experience† in a three-dimensional space. By congregating them into one space could form â€Å"a lace for aesthetic experience† (Watchmaker and Mammoth 2005, 83). Figure 2. Mashing, Japan (Source: http://architects. Files. Wordless. Com/2011 /06/chichi_panorama Jpg) The chosen site (Figure 2) was based on the likes of the initial client, Choirs Effectuate whom had a special liking towards the views of Sets Inland Sea and other islands from a place in Mashing (Watchmaker and Mammoth 2005, 83). The site was a good match with a three dimensional space envisioned by Monet – a space that by itself is a piece of art giving birth to the idea of a space that blends art and architecture together seamlessly. Hence instead of a monumental building sitting on the site, the building took the form of 2 an underground building with no apparent form. The visitor world experience each artist’s space, one by one independently, and was prevented from looking at the building as a whole. Upon gathering all the experiences, they would then discover the structure in its entirety, and the relationships and arrangements between spaces (Figure 3). Figure 3. Illustration of Separate volumes coming together in the site (Source: Today And at Mashing: art, architecture, nature. ) The final museum itself, shown in Figure 3 embodies a mastery of light and materials that seek to reconnect with the elements of â€Å"art and nature†. To maintain the existing environment and aesthetics of the site, And chose to ‘bury’ the museum underground. Only a series of concrete openings and geometrical skylights float among the greenery shown in Figure 4. He dedicated a separate space for each of the artists’ gallery, bounding them together with a triangular courtyard that connects all the exhibition spaces via a mixed sequence of spaces – light and dark, open and closed. Figure 4. Concrete opening and Skylight 3 THE INTERFACE . 1 Today Nod’s Chichi Art Museum Mashing 3 From Section 2, we understood that And made the decision to integrate art and nature as one by placing the building underground thus giving Chichi its name. Yet in his design, we see stark signs of man – made influences to the site, the most obvious being the introduction of concrete volumes that encompasses the entire site. As visitors enters the 27,700 square foot reinforced-concrete Chichi Museum, they will discover the diminishing sunlight taken over by the disorientating semidarkness. The tunnel-like passageway provides a full separation from the external environment ND leads them into a square-sis forecourt carpeted with green stalks of bamboo-like grass (Pollock 2005, 116). This initial experience that And created as his entrance sounds rather intimidating. The uniqueness and unfamiliarity created a rather daunting feeling, and nature is nowhere mentioned or considered when one enters the space. Is the integration with nature only a surface treatment to the architecture by infusing the building underground? Perhaps And was looking more into interfacing art and architecture together rather than interfacing the culture with nature. For our interpretation of a seamless interface with nature seem to be different from Nod’s radical representation of nature in his work. Yet where did our interpretation come from? 3. 2 Frank Lloyd Wright’s Billingsgate Figure 5. Billingsgate and the terraces (Source: HTTPS://blobs. Alt. VT. Dude/Kristin/files/2012/12/few Jpg) One of the historical buildings that perfectly epitomize the concept of one with nature is Frank Lloyd Wright’s 4 Billingsgate. You read "Weaving Architecture Nature" in category "Papers" Wild animals live near it; Trees surround it; Water swirls underneath; huge beclouded rest at its feet; the house’s terraces echo the pattern of the rock ledges below (Figure 5). Billingsgate seeks to find harmony with nature. Instead of scoping a natural landscape for its inhabitants, the Kauffmann, Frank integrated the waterfalls with the architecture and hence integrated the falls into their lives. Figure 6. Elevation and Section of Billingsgate with materials (Source: Billingsgate: Frank Lloyd Wright’s romance with nature. ) Wright furthered the integration with nature via his selection of materials. He kept his selection to merely 4 materials – sandstone, reinforced concrete, steel and glass and integrated them as part of the natural environment (Figure 6). All the stone at Billingsgate was quarried from the bottom of the waterfalls. Beams are designed in an arc shaped Just so to allow tree to grow through the trellis. The chosen concrete was of a pale ochre color to match the back of a fallen rhododendron leaf (Hangman 2011, 40). Exposed steel was painted red to give a raw feeling; reminding people of the red color of iron ore and also of the fiery method used to create steel. Clear glass was used to extend the nature into the interior of the house, sometimes becoming reflective like mirror-like surfaces of a calm pool, and at night, disappears to eliminate any distinction between the interior and exterior. Understanding Wright’s design and linking it to integration with nature seemed almost redundant as the building encapsulates the whole concept. It is simple to relate the architecture as part of the landscape, and the concept of integration was strongly showed in every angle, which was not seen for the case of Chichi Art 5 Museum. 3. New Interpretation As a 3rd generation museum, perhaps we should not Judge the interface at its mere surface. Was there more to its looks for the Chichi art museum? From the Periphery of Architecture, And wrote â€Å"Nature in the form of water, light ND sky restores architecture from a metaphysical to an earthly plane and gives life to architecture. A concern for the relationship between architecture and nature ine vitably leads to a concern for the temporal context of architecture. I want to emphasize the sense of time and to create compositions in which a feeling of transience or the passing of time is a part of the spatial experience. (And 2005, 465) Nod’s interpretation of the interface between architecture and nature showed that it should not be merely a visual effect, but a more in-depth understanding and experience towards nature. It is thus reasonable to feel that what And is doing with his architecture was in particular, to isolate natural elements in blending them with the architecture. Yes one would not feel the natural environment, for we have never experienced nature in its rawness. Our idea of sunlight goes together with landscape, with clouds, with mountains and seas. We do not see light as a unit on its own. Figure 7. A Collage of the Monet Gallery at Chichi Art Museum This ideology was translated rather well in the Chichi Art Museum project. For Motet’s Gallery where the 6 tater lilies situate, the experience starts with changing your shoes to soft indoor slippers at the shoebox followed by a vacant room before the exhibition gallery. The dim experience diminishes through the rectangular open entrance, where silky light trickles in. Once we enter the Motet’s room, the transparent veil of light surrounds us. The completely white atmosphere, the white frames, white walls, white ceiling, and white floors seem to be representative of the raw sunlight, as it fills the environment. This enabled the paintings to have an illusion that it is relieved of its endings to the frame and Joins the space as floating scenery (Figure 7). The gentle ramp that circulates around the central triangular courtyard features a slit in the walls, exposing elements of light into the dim passageway creates a transition of space yet connecting the spatial qualities of the Monet gallery to the other galleries (Figure 8). This triangular courtyard exposes only rough stones at its surface, propelling vision from the visitors towards the sky (Figure 8). In James Turret’s Installation of the Open Sky, visitors are given the opportunity to enjoy the natural sky IA a framed skylight and observe the changes where visitors may see sunlight shining through the window, clouds drifting by or a lingering evening glow. Figure 8. The triangular courtyard (Source: Chichi Art Museum: Today And builds for Walter De Maria, James Turrets, and Claude Monet. The entire approach of Chichi Art Museum in integrating with nature forms a critical questioning of the natural environment. It forcefully brings out nature via the use of concrete envelope. The physical interface here is the concrete building, although man-made, it seems to be the perfect medium to bring the isolated 7 tater into the art and architecture. The Chichi Museum is thus a successful effort between the architect and the artists, people and nature, a cting as a specific artwork in itself. Even the form as seen from the exterior, is like an art piece, infused within the mountains (Figure 9). This made the argument in 3. Invalid as the approach took by And in creating a dramatic entrance was Justifiable if his intention of integrating with nature is as discussed. Figure 8. Series of mediums illustrating the building infused into the site. (Source: Chichi Art Museum: Today And builds for Walter De Maria, James Turrets, and Claude Monet. ) The isolation of nature to provide the integrated experience is not a new concept. Even in Wright’s Billingsgate, we can see hints of this method used. In integrating the waterfall into the architecture, instead of scoping a view, Wright chose to situate the house right on top of it. How to cite Weaving Architecture Nature, Papers

Legacy From The Middle Ages Essays - Education, Crafts, Guild

Legacy from the Middle ages Many cultural advancements were made during the Dark Ages which lasted between 500AD and 1000AD. Culture can be divided into five distinct categories such as religion/philosophy, government, science, art/architecture and language/literature. During the Middle ages, there was a great advancement in theology and many of todays finest universities were built such as the Oxford University and some others in Paris and Rome. In the early 20th century, many other universities were built using the First universities as a base. Oxford University still exists, as one of the most respected school in the world. There were also a lot of religious conflicts mainly between Muslims and Christians over the possession of Constantinople. Although the crusades were overall a failure, historians believe that is was the most important failure in history as it broke off Feudalism and changed peoples thinking. In government, there was a significant change when in 1215, Magna Carta was signed, stating that not even the King is above the law. This period of time can also be seen as the beginning of true representative government which almost every system of government is based upon today. Guilds were also established in this period. They were groups of people with the same skills. They met to control the economy by changing the price, quantity and quality. There are more of these guilds today, as different associations which control the price of raw materials. The guilds in the Dark ages gave more power to ordinary workers and helped the representative government. Although not many scientific discoveries were made during the Middle ages, the study of alchemy helped later scientist to find scientific facts about each element and its usage. In architecture the Romanesque style was perfected through churches, which was later dominated by the Gothic style, which became the international mode of building in the future. In paintings, more detail was given to the emotional side and to nature. Reading and writing became a very common skill as for the first time in the vernacular languages, written work was made public for leisure. Many writings dealt with the complexity of life and with romance. A lot of the cultural advancements established during the Middle ages can be seen today, often as the base of our culture. Many things changed during the Dark ages and that is why it is considered one of the most important period of time in History

E Business essays

E Business essays A typical infrastructure of any technological system' would serve to connect all the various components that make up the entire structure and provide information on links between each of the elements. In the infrastructure of systems', the computer network as well as the information network would make up the structure of the business. The various elements are generally entire networking software, and a hardware system made up of computers, servers, modems, hubs, and any form of wireless technology. The building in which the business is to be housed will consist of the building infrastructure' that will be made up of the system that will support the information technology network system. This will be made up of electrical cables and wires, conduits, and electricity that will help in the functioning of all the above listed components, as well as for the safety measures of fire alarms, etc. The most important component of any business is the human element, and this third component makes up the personnel infrastructure'. These skilled people serve to provide the basic infrastructure of the business. This group is comprised of personnel involved in training, network management, technical help and assistance wherever necessary, the development and creation of the content of the course, the support given to learners or beginners, and help in administration. (Part 3- Technology Infrastructure Issues) It is important to know what the advantages of an e-business are and how income is generated when a person want to start an e-business of his own. The best part of an e-business is that the principles of this business can be applied to a business that is already in existence, and also for a newly starting up business. This is a business whereby access to customers becomes easi...

USS Ranger CV-4 World War II Aircraft Carrier

USS Ranger CV-4 World War II Aircraft Carrier USS Ranger (CV-4) Overview Nation: United StatesType: Aircraft CarrierShipyard: Newport News Shipbuilding Drydock CompanyLaid Down: September 26, 1931Launched: February 25, 1933Commissioned: June 4, 1934Fate: Scrapped Specifications Displacement: 14,576 tonsLength: 730 ft.Beam: 109 ft., 5 in.Draft: 22 ft., 4.875 in.Propulsion: 6 Ãâ€" boilers, 2 Ãâ€" Westinghouse geared steam turbines, 2 Ãâ€" shaftsSpeed: 29.3 knotsRange: 12,000 nautical miles at 15 knotsComplement: 2,461 men Armament 8 Ãâ€" 5 in./25 cal anti-aircraft guns40 Ãâ€" .50 in. machine guns Aircraft 76-86 aircraft Design Development In the 1920s, the US Navy commenced the construction of its first three aircraft carriers. These efforts, which produced USS Langley (CV-1), USS Lexington (CV-2), and USS Saratoga (CV-3), all involved the conversion of existing hulls into carriers. As work on these ships progressed, the US Navy began designing its first purpose-built carrier. These efforts were constrained by the limits imposed by the Washington Naval Treaty which capped both the size of individual ships and the total tonnage. With the completion of Lexington and Saratoga, the US Navy had 69,000 tons remaining which could be assigned to aircraft carriers.   As such, the US Navy intended for the new design to displace 13,800 tons per ship so that five carriers could be constructed. Despite these intentions, only one ship of the new class would actually be built.    Dubbed USS Ranger (CV-4), the new carriers name hearkened back to the sloop of war commanded by Commodore John Paul Jones during the American Revolution. Laid down at the Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company on September 26, 1931, the carriers initial design called for an unobstructed flight deck with no island and six funnels, three to side, that were hinged to fold horizontally during air operations. Aircraft were housed below on a semi-open hangar deck and brought to the flight deck via three elevators. Though smaller than Lexington and Saratoga, Rangers purpose-built design led to an aircraft capacity that was only marginally less than its predecessors. The carriers reduced size did present certain challenges as its narrow hull required the use of geared turbines for propulsion.   As work on Ranger progressed, alterations to the design occurred including the addition of an island superstructure on the starboard side of the flight deck. The ships defensive armament consisted of eight 5-inch guns and forty .50-inch machine guns. Sliding down the ways on February 25, 1933, Ranger was sponsored by First Lady Lou H. Hoover. Over the next year, work continued and the carrier was completed. Commissioned on June 4, 1934 at the Norfolk Navy Yard with Captain Arthur L. Bristol in command, Ranger commenced shakedown exercises off the Virginia Capes before beginning air operations on June 21. The first landing on the new carrier was conducted by Lieutenant Commander A.C. Davis flying a Vought SBU-1. Further training for Rangers air group was conducted in August. Interwar Years Later in August, Ranger departed on an extended shakedown cruise to South America which included port calls at Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, and Montevideo. Returning to Norfolk, VA, the carrier conducted operations locally before receiving orders for the Pacific in April 1935. Passing through the Panama Canal, Ranger arrived at San Diego, CA on the 15th. Remaining in the Pacific for the next four years, the carrier took part in fleet maneuvers and war games as far west as Hawaii and as far south as Callao, Peru while also experimenting with cold weather operations off Alaska. In January 1939, Ranger departed California and sailed for Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to participate in winter fleet maneuvers. With the completion of these exercises, it steamed to Norfolk where it arrived in late April. Operating along the East Coast through the summer of 1939, Ranger was assigned to the Neutrality Patrol that fall following the outbreak of World War II in Europe. The initial responsibility of this force was to track warlike operations of combatant forces in the Western Hemisphere. Patrolling between Bermuda and Argentia, Newfoundland, Rangers seakeeping ability was found lacking as it proved difficult to conduct operations in heavy weather. This issue had been identified earlier and helped contribute to the design of the later Yorktown-class carriers. Continuing with the Neutrality Patrol through 1940, the carriers air group was one of the first to receive the new Grumman F4F Wildcat fighter that December. In In late 1941, Ranger was returning to Norfolk from a patrol to Port-of-Spain, Trinidad when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7. World War II Begins Departing Norfolk two weeks later, Ranger conducted a patrol of the South Atlantic before entering drydock in March 1942. Undergoing repairs, the carrier also received the new RCA CXAM-1 radar. Deemed too slow to keep up with newer carriers, such as USS Yorktown (CV-5) and USS Enterprise (CV-6), in Pacific, Ranger remained in the Atlantic to support operations against Germany. With the completion of repairs, Ranger sailed on April 22 to deliver a force of sixty-eight P-40 Warhawks to Accra, Gold Coast. Returning to Quonset Point, RI in late May, the carrier conducted a patrol to Argentia before delivering a second cargo of P-40s to Accra in July. Both shipments of P-40s were destined for China where they were to serve with the American Volunteer Group (Flying Tigers). With the completion of this mission, Ranger operated off Norfolk before joining four new Sangamon-class escort carriers (Sangamon, Suwannee, Chenango, and Santee) at Bermuda. Operation Torch Leading this carrier force, Ranger provided air superiority for the Operation Torch landings in Vichy-ruled French Morocco in November 1942. Early on November 8, Ranger began launching aircraft from a position approximately 30 miles northwest of Casablanca. While F4F Wildcats strafed Vichy airfields, SBD Dauntless dive bombers struck at Vichy naval vessels. In three days of operations, Ranger launched 496 sorties which resulted in the destruction of around 85 enemy aircraft (15 in the air, approx. 70 on the ground), the sinking of the battleship Jean Bart, severe damage to the destroyer leader Albatros, and attacks on the cruiser Primaugut. With the fall of Casablanca to American forces on November 11, the carrier departed for Norfolk the next day. Arriving, Ranger underwent an overhaul from December 16, 1942 to February 7, 1943. With the Home Fleet Departing the yard, Ranger carried a load of P-40s to Africa for use by the 58th Fighter Group before spending much of the summer of 1943 conducting pilot training off the New England coast. Crossing the Atlantic in late August, the carrier joined the British Home Fleet at Scapa Flow in the Orkney Islands. Putting out on October 2 as part of Operation Leader, Ranger and a combined Anglo-American force moved towards Norway with the goal of attacking German shipping around Vestfjorden. Avoiding detection, Ranger began launching aircraft on October 4. Striking a short time later, the aircraft sank two merchant vessels in Bodo roadstead and damaged several more. Though located by three German aircraft, the carriers combat air patrol downed two and chased off the third. A second strike succeeded in sinking a freighter and a smaller coastal vessel. Returning to Scapa Flow, Ranger commenced patrols to Iceland with the British Second Battle Squadron. These continued until late November when the carrier detached and sailed for Boston, MA. Later Career Too slow to operate with the fast carrier forces in the Pacific, Ranger was designated as a training carrier and ordered to operate out of Quonset Point on January 3, 1944. These duties were interrupted in April when it transported a cargo of P-38 Lightning to Casablanca. While in Morocco, it embarked several damaged aircraft as well as numerous passengers for transport to New York. After arriving in New York, Ranger steamed to Norfolk for an overhaul. Though Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest King favored a massive overhaul to bring the carrier on par with its contemporaries, he was discouraged in following through by his staff who pointed out that the project would draw resources away from new construction. As a result, the project was limited to strengthening the flight deck, installation of new catapults, and improving the ships radar systems. With the completion of the overhaul, Ranger sailed for San Diego where it embarked Night Fighting Squadron 102 before pressing on to Pearl Harbor. From August to October, it conducted night carrier flight training operations in Hawaiian waters before returning to California to serve as a training carrier. Operating from San Diego, Ranger spent the remainder of the war training naval aviators off the California coast. With the end of the war in September, it transited the Panama Canal and made stops at New Orleans, LA, Pensacola, FL, and Norfolk before reaching the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard on November 19. After a brief overhaul, Ranger resumed operations on the East Coast until being decommissioned on October 18, 1946. The carrier was sold for scrap the following January. Selected Sources DANFS: USS Ranger (CV-4)Air Group 4: USS RangerMilitary Factory: USS Ranger (CV-4)